<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whither the Double Taper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com</link>
	<description>The website of John Juracek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Juracek</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>John Juracek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Bill,
Thanks for your comments.  I haven&#039;t miked any light WF lines recently, but am surprised (happily) that the ones you&#039;ve used have delicate tips.  That&#039;s good.  I&#039;m always encouraging the manufacturers to lengthen front tapers and tips on all lines for that very reason.
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
Thanks for your comments.  I haven&#8217;t miked any light WF lines recently, but am surprised (happily) that the ones you&#8217;ve used have delicate tips.  That&#8217;s good.  I&#8217;m always encouraging the manufacturers to lengthen front tapers and tips on all lines for that very reason.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-562</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the comments in the article, but I have noticed that many WF lines, especially in the smaller trout sizes, have a longer and finer front tip and taper than DT lines.  When I&#039;m fishing small freestone rivers or spring creeks where I&#039;ll rarely cast into the running line, it&#039;s nice to have that delicate tip and taper rather than the rather clunky characteristics of a DT line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the comments in the article, but I have noticed that many WF lines, especially in the smaller trout sizes, have a longer and finer front tip and taper than DT lines.  When I&#8217;m fishing small freestone rivers or spring creeks where I&#8217;ll rarely cast into the running line, it&#8217;s nice to have that delicate tip and taper rather than the rather clunky characteristics of a DT line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OkieFlier</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>OkieFlier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the insight!  Being a newby to fly fishing I was convinced that I needed a WF line and to stay clear of double-tapered lines.  Now I&#039;ll order a double taper and give it a try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insight!  Being a newby to fly fishing I was convinced that I needed a WF line and to stay clear of double-tapered lines.  Now I&#8217;ll order a double taper and give it a try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nooksack Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Nooksack Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-554</guid>
		<description>I recently did extensive testing of 4- and 5-weight double taper and weight forward lines on various rods, tape-measuring the maximum casts on grass.  The results confirmed what I&#039;d noticed for years: that there is surprisingly little difference in casting ease or maximum distance.  The maximums ran from 70&#039;+ to around 80 feet (leader included).  These are much longer than one typically makes in trout fishing, especially on streams.  

Even without shooting line, a weight forward wants to be cast with the head at the rod tip and the running line in hand.  With a double taper, we just pick up and cast whatever length is needed, without thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently did extensive testing of 4- and 5-weight double taper and weight forward lines on various rods, tape-measuring the maximum casts on grass.  The results confirmed what I&#8217;d noticed for years: that there is surprisingly little difference in casting ease or maximum distance.  The maximums ran from 70&#8242;+ to around 80 feet (leader included).  These are much longer than one typically makes in trout fishing, especially on streams.  </p>
<p>Even without shooting line, a weight forward wants to be cast with the head at the rod tip and the running line in hand.  With a double taper, we just pick up and cast whatever length is needed, without thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double taper vs. weight forward fly lines &#124; Lackawanna Valley TU Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Double taper vs. weight forward fly lines &#124; Lackawanna Valley TU Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-551</guid>
		<description>[...] you fish a weight forward line and not a double taper line? Perhaps you should read this. Share this:EmailPrintLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Fly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you fish a weight forward line and not a double taper line? Perhaps you should read this. Share this:EmailPrintLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Fly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Juracek</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>John Juracek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Phil,
Thanks for reading this article and for taking the time to comment on it.  Your perspective from the UK is interesting...
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
Thanks for reading this article and for taking the time to comment on it.  Your perspective from the UK is interesting&#8230;<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-517</guid>
		<description>I feel that this is mainly due to the new-found popularity of Spey-casting in the UK. A couple of points - firstly, I go fishing to fish, not to cast. Secondly, not one in ten spey casters can turn their leader over properly, thus defeating the object of the exercise.
A marketing project that enables spey casters to feel that they are &quot;in the moment&quot; whilst reducing their cances of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that this is mainly due to the new-found popularity of Spey-casting in the UK. A couple of points &#8211; firstly, I go fishing to fish, not to cast. Secondly, not one in ten spey casters can turn their leader over properly, thus defeating the object of the exercise.<br />
A marketing project that enables spey casters to feel that they are &#8220;in the moment&#8221; whilst reducing their cances of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Juracek</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>John Juracek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Great blog, and even greater photos.  Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, and even greater photos.  Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Juracek</title>
		<link>http://www.johnjuracek.com/whither-the-double-taper/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>John Juracek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnjuracek.com/?page_id=405#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Mark,
I&#039;ve hammered on the manufacturers for years about this subject, but for them it boils down to economics.  If they promoted double-tapers, they would sell roughly half the number of lines they do now.  Not much incentive in that...
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
I&#8217;ve hammered on the manufacturers for years about this subject, but for them it boils down to economics.  If they promoted double-tapers, they would sell roughly half the number of lines they do now.  Not much incentive in that&#8230;<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
